e7d68aa6d0
Seven public-sector solicitations and rubric samples read by #22 from live URLs and never saved. #22's ninth hazard was that these 403 without warning, so archival is the irreversible-if-lost part of #30. All seven retrieved. Two corrections to #22's record: SLC Airport is 142pp not 55pp, and Tarrant County is an award tabulation rather than a solicitation — it validates ranking arithmetic but cannot be authored against. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
53 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# Corpus
|
||
|
||
Source documents for the synthesized response corpus (#30). Archived 2026-08-03
|
||
because #22 read them from live URLs and kept nothing — and its ninth hazard was
|
||
that live procurement PDFs 403 or return bot-challenge HTML without warning.
|
||
|
||
All seven retrieved successfully; none of the 403s #22 hit recurred.
|
||
|
||
## Authoring anchors — solicitations we can write responses to
|
||
|
||
| Path | Pages | Why |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| `friendship-pcs/rfp.pdf` | 52 | Grocery, nested rubric, closest to the retail domain. Its price sheet is a separate Excel attachment, which exercises #22's second extraction hazard. |
|
||
| `slc-airport/rfp.pdf` | 142 | Richest binding structure — paragraph headings A–M restated verbatim. Has a shortlist-for-interviews stage that exercises the `finalist` release level. |
|
||
|
||
## Validation artifact — not a solicitation
|
||
|
||
`tarrant-county/rfp.pdf` (1pp) is an **award tabulation**, not an RFP. No
|
||
requirements, so nothing can be written against it. What it holds is the only
|
||
real published outcome in the set:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Evaluation Criteria Max Five Star Selrico Trinity
|
||
Management & Support Staff 25 15.84 15.00 16.36
|
||
Meal and Service Plan 25 15.20 16.30 17.30
|
||
Financial Stability 20 12.00 12.00 12.00
|
||
Meal Price 25 25.00 24.52 22.23
|
||
References 5 3.77 3.07 2.73
|
||
Total Score 100 71.81 70.89 70.62
|
||
PRIMARY SECONDARY ALTERNATE
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Three vendors inside 1.19 points. This is what ranking arithmetic gets checked
|
||
against — the only place in the corpus where our maths can be wrong in a way
|
||
that is detectable rather than self-consistent. It is also concrete evidence for
|
||
storing fractional scores: rounding erases this result entirely.
|
||
|
||
## Reference — rubric and pricing shapes, not authored against
|
||
|
||
| Path | Pages | Why |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| `reference/salt-lake-county-scoring-criteria.pdf` | 3 | A second 0–5 scale with incompatible labels — the evidence that scales are per-document. |
|
||
| `reference/nevada-asd-401-eval-worksheet.pdf` | 1 | The generic default rubric procurement offices reach for. |
|
||
| `reference/maryland-dgs-mbe-forms.pdf` | 27 | Nested percentage compliance — a constraint program, not a field. |
|
||
| `reference/arkansas-unit-price-bid-sheet.pdf` | 4 | Rate-function pricing: unit × frequency × quantity. |
|
||
|
||
## Corrections to #22's record
|
||
|
||
- SLC Airport is **142pp**, not 55pp.
|
||
- Maryland MBE forms are **27pp**, not 20pp.
|
||
- Tarrant County was described as a document with a score tabulation; it is
|
||
*only* a tabulation, which changes its role in the corpus.
|