christian/helmdocs-proposal-system
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 8 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Archive corpus source documents

Browse Source 
Seven public-sector solicitations and rubric samples read by #22 from live
URLs and never saved. #22's ninth hazard was that these 403 without warning,
so archival is the irreversible-if-lost part of #30.

All seven retrieved. Two corrections to #22's record: SLC Airport is 142pp
not 55pp, and Tarrant County is an award tabulation rather than a
solicitation — it validates ranking arithmetic but cannot be authored against.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christian
2026-08-03 17:54:38 -04:00
parent da74362d00
commit e7d68aa6d0
8 changed files with 52 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

52
corpus/README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
# Corpus
Source documents for the synthesized response corpus (#30). Archived 2026-08-03
because #22 read them from live URLs and kept nothing — and its ninth hazard was
that live procurement PDFs 403 or return bot-challenge HTML without warning.
All seven retrieved successfully; none of the 403s #22 hit recurred.
## Authoring anchors — solicitations we can write responses to
| Path | Pages | Why |
|---|---|---|
| `friendship-pcs/rfp.pdf` | 52 | Grocery, nested rubric, closest to the retail domain. Its price sheet is a separate Excel attachment, which exercises #22's second extraction hazard. |
| `slc-airport/rfp.pdf` | 142 | Richest binding structure — paragraph headings A–M restated verbatim. Has a shortlist-for-interviews stage that exercises the `finalist` release level. |
## Validation artifact — not a solicitation
`tarrant-county/rfp.pdf` (1pp) is an **award tabulation**, not an RFP. No
requirements, so nothing can be written against it. What it holds is the only
real published outcome in the set:
```
Evaluation Criteria Max Five Star Selrico Trinity
Management & Support Staff 25 15.84 15.00 16.36
Meal and Service Plan 25 15.20 16.30 17.30
Financial Stability 20 12.00 12.00 12.00
Meal Price 25 25.00 24.52 22.23
References 5 3.77 3.07 2.73
Total Score 100 71.81 70.89 70.62
PRIMARY SECONDARY ALTERNATE
```
Three vendors inside 1.19 points. This is what ranking arithmetic gets checked
against — the only place in the corpus where our maths can be wrong in a way
that is detectable rather than self-consistent. It is also concrete evidence for
storing fractional scores: rounding erases this result entirely.
## Reference — rubric and pricing shapes, not authored against
| Path | Pages | Why |
|---|---|---|
| `reference/salt-lake-county-scoring-criteria.pdf` | 3 | A second 0–5 scale with incompatible labels — the evidence that scales are per-document. |
| `reference/nevada-asd-401-eval-worksheet.pdf` | 1 | The generic default rubric procurement offices reach for. |
| `reference/maryland-dgs-mbe-forms.pdf` | 27 | Nested percentage compliance — a constraint program, not a field. |
| `reference/arkansas-unit-price-bid-sheet.pdf` | 4 | Rate-function pricing: unit × frequency × quantity. |
## Corrections to #22's record
- SLC Airport is **142pp**, not 55pp.
- Maryland MBE forms are **27pp**, not 20pp.
- Tarrant County was described as a document with a score tabulation; it is
*only* a tabulation, which changes its role in the corpus.